// 02 LINE TYPES
Understanding the Three Route Types
IEPL, relay, and direct routes are not simply better or worse tiers. They use different network paths, with different resource costs, use cases, and sensitivity to local network conditions. Understand the basics first, then choose based on your task rather than relying on one route type all the time.
// A
IEPL
More Control Over the Cross-Border Path
IEPL routes carry cross-border traffic over specially organized international links, reducing uncontrolled intermediate hops on the public internet. They are generally well suited to work sessions that require continuity, high-definition video, and sustained transfers. “IEPL” describes the connection method; it does not mean the target website will never throttle traffic or that fluctuations in the local access network are eliminated.
These resources generally cost more to organize and maintain than ordinary direct public-internet routes, making them a practical priority for critical tasks. Start by selecting an IEPL region nearby. If the target service has a specific regional requirement, prioritize regional matching over distance.
// B
Relay
Connect to an Entry Point First, Then Reach the Egress
A relay route first sends the connection to an entry point that is easier to reach, then forwards it through an intermediate link to the target region. This makes it possible to adjust entry-and-egress combinations for different local networks instead of relying on a single end-to-end public route. Relay is often a balanced choice for distant target regions, visibly indirect direct paths, or regions with varying access quality.
A relay is not automatically faster than every direct route or weaker than an IEPL route. Focus on whether the entry point suits your current carrier, whether the egress fits the task, and whether the connection remains stable over time. If one relay entry point performs poorly, try another entry point in the same region before changing countries.
// C
Direct
A Simpler Path, with More Direct Public-Network Effects
Direct routes connect from the local network straight to a server in the target region without adding a dedicated forwarding entry point. Their simpler path suits ordinary web browsing, backup connections, and situations where the local network already has a good route to the target region. Direct performance depends more heavily on the carrier’s international exit and actual routing, so the same city may perform very differently across networks.
Direct routes generally cost less to organize than IEPL routes and make broader regional coverage practical. They can be useful when you need a less common egress region. For routine access to a fixed region, use direct as a primary or backup option and judge it by page-load speed, session continuity, and the target service’s regional detection.